Union Budget 2026: The Buyback Blowback For Founders

As Published on Inc42.

Budget 2026 focused on removing artificial distortions in the law and making tax administration and taxation easier for taxpayers. Yet it perpetuated the flawed treatment of buyback taxation in India. While the new regime offers relief to employees, it maintains a punitive status quo for the builders of the Indian startup ecosystem.

1. The Tax Conflict: Dividend vs. Capital Gains

The previous buyback regime introduced in 2024 treated all gains from buybacks as dividend income, with the corresponding acquisition cost being treated as a capital loss. This distorted the true nature of buybacks and lead to a compliance burden for shareholders. 

A buyback is legally a Capital Gains event. It meets the definition in letter and spirit:

• Asset: The security.
• Transfer: The extinguishment of the share.
• Gain: The profit realized.

2. The Winners: Employees and Small Shareholders

The buyback changes are positive for employees and small shareholders as it treat s buyback income as “capital gains” for all shareholders who hold less than 10% of a Company. This allows buybacks to become an acceptable exit avenue for employees, who must pay tax at the slab rates upon exercise of their ESOPs. Taxing the subsequent gains as ordinary income fully negates the benefits of ESOPs.

ESOP buybacks were a common way to create liquidity for employees and inspire confidence in ESOPs as a tool of wealth creation. The pernicious tax treatment offered to buybacks in 2024 reduced the attractiveness of this route, leading to higher cash outflows for startups.

3. The "Promoter" Penalty: The Devil in the Details

However, the devil in the details lies in how promoters are treated during a buyback. The definition of a promoter is similar to SEBI and the Companies Act, 2013, but also includes shareholders holding more than 10% of the Company. Their buyback gains are taxed at 22% for corporates and at 30% for non-corporates. Foreign shareholders would see a benefit as their buyback income would be capped at 30%, as opposed to the slab rate. 

For Founders, the status quo unfortunately continues. This will also affect secondary discussions and pricing for companies looking to fundraise in the future. 

4. The (un)intended Consequences for Investors

The clubbing of shareholders above 10% as “promoters” is of particular concern as financial investors often insist on language that they are not to be considered as promoters for any purposes. Startup deals are highly negotiated, and a 10% shareholding does not constitute control or significant influence. But this deemed promoter status to deny the buyback benefits is concerning. 

Conclusion: A Bittersweet Victory

The new regime creates a bifurcated system that effectively punishes the "builders." Startup founders and financial investors, the very people who take the greatest risks, are the ones most likely to hold concentrated stakes above the 10% threshold.

By tethering capital gains to ownership percentages, India has replaced one complexity with another. For the startup ecosystem, this "partial sense" is a bittersweet victory: the exit door is open, but the toll for those who built the house remains disproportionately high.

‍

DISCLAIMER

_{The views expressed herein are those of the author as of the publication date and are subject to change without notice. Neither the author nor any of the entities under the 3one4 Capital Group have any obligation to update the content. This publications are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as providing any advisory service (including financial, regulatory, or legal). It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities or related financial instruments in any jurisdiction. Readers should perform their own due diligence and consult with relevant advisors before taking any decisions. Any reliance on the information herein is at the reader's own risk, and 3one4 Capital Group assumes no liability for any such reliance.Certain information is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but neither the author nor 3one4 Capital Group guarantees its accuracy, recency or completeness. There has been no independent verification of such information or the assumptions on which such information is based, unless expressly mentioned otherwise. References to specific companies, securities, or investment strategies are not endorsements. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or use of this document, in whole or in part, is prohibited without prior written consent from the author and/or the 3one4 Capital Group.}